標題: The two fraudsters were sentenced
無頭像
weekendx6me
註冊會員
Rank: 1

積分 50
帖子 1129
註冊 2012-2-20
用戶註冊天數 4468
用戶失蹤天數 4332
狀態 離線
發表於 2012-6-15 05:13 AM 
110.85.114.104
分享  私人訊息  頂部
The Sun Lanxia the case, for example,ナイキ スニ?カ?, after Yueyang City Intermediate People's Court identified Sun Lanxia has deposited $ 5.5 million in the Agricultural Bank of China branch and has made the current savings passbook issued by the Agricultural Bank of China branch,louboutin, the certificate of deposit in the form true and lawful. But the funds are actually political Qin Zhang removed, so the case is not a general certificate of deposit disputes, but the certificate of deposit for the manifestation of the lending disputes. According to the Supreme People's Court on the trial of the certificate of deposit disputes "," certificates of deposit for the manifestation of the borrowing, are illegal lending, investors,burberry soldes, financial institutions use people for their involvement in illegal lending shall bear corresponding civil liability ", The Yueyang court held that the high spreads the Sun Lanxia charge of $ 100 million to offset the principal judgment of the Agricultural Bank of China branch to repay Sun Lanxia principal amount of 4.5 million yuan and 11,200 yuan of interest.
Trial controversy: the money of depositors in the end who will also
The two fraudsters were sentenced,air jordan, but tens of millions of dollars of depositors' of the Who  They have sued the ABC branch court, required to pay their deposits and interest. However, litigation twists and turns, be suspended in case you want to hear about until this year, after another hearing.
's Court in Yueyang City,herve leger, Hunan Province for financial fraud sentenced to 15 years imprisonment and a fine of 300,000 yuan. Zhang Ling guilty of financial fraud and embezzlement of public funds, was sentenced to eight years in prison and a fine of 50,000 yuan.
The depositors side agreement YI Wei and Zhang Zheng Qin,louboutin pas cher, depositors have never seen,louboutin, can not represent the views of the depositor. In fact, the depositor will deposit the money to banks, have lost their dominance of deposit withdrawals before. Agricultural Bank of China branch also recognize the passbooks of the depositors is true, has never denied the legitimacy of its passbook,franklin marshall pas cher, "since it is true, legal books, why not receive the protection of the law "
Until September of this year, this series of cases was re-trial. In the court on October 18, the two sides on the case of qualitative occurred a heated argument. Agricultural Bank of China branch party believes that these depositors are illegal loans and Zhang Zheng Qin conspiracy, the formation of underground banks get high interest rates, shift the risk onto the bank. Depositors who save money is false, or to borrow money is really in this process, banks are the victims. Zhang Ling Although in operation irregularities, but it is acting in accordance with the views of both lenders and borrowers, as presented to Zhang Ling Zhang Zheng Qin before the withdrawal of his agreement with YI Wei, so that depositors have specified payee.
Agricultural Bank of China branch that depositors Zhang Zheng Qin conspiracy to engage in illegal loans to shift risk onto the bank statement, the depositor does not comply with the fact that its purpose is to evade and vicarious liability, depositors who want to get high interest rates do not leave , but the money to the bank with a high degree of credit, no doubt hope that in the case of no risk to get high interest rates, which thought that the bank's money will be insecure, if not the illegal operations of the bank staff, depositors in the bank The money would never have been illegally transferred out. "
At this point, Sun Lanxia think that money can finally get it back, Agricultural Bank of China branch did not expect the retrial, the Hunan High Court ruling remanded the case for a retrial in the hospital Yueyang. Yueyang in hospital by Zhang Cheng Chin suspected of economic crimes, criminal cases have not yet concluded on the grounds to discontinue the proceedings. This abort is nearly two years. Depositors who do not understand the criminal cases as early as November 2009 final of the rea